tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-76710558743505845222024-03-05T16:43:32.636-08:00Orchard Of LifeEach organelle of a cell replicates in some way separate from the cell itself. Vesicles on their own forms from self-assembly, while others have their own genome. A larger cell they may live inside a vessel to protect the pool of plasma. It is the behavior of the organelles that explains why cells of different kinds behave as they do. With such "horizontal transfer" at the very base and DNA genome evidence showing much more later the thought of a single tree no longer works in science.Gary Gaulinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10925297296758439900noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7671055874350584522.post-80820421035439335582009-03-15T18:31:00.000-07:002009-03-15T20:05:09.523-07:00Corrected Tree(s) Of LifeNew Scientist has a very exciting article on how genetics is turning the "tree of life" into a "trees of life".<br /><br /><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.600-why-darwin-was-wrong-about-the-tree-of-life.html?full=true">http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20126921.600-why-darwin-was-wrong-about-the-tree-of-life.html?full=true</a><br /><br />With that now coming to science here are a few years old graphics I had on my computer. They were first found on a website comparing the Creation Science perspective to Darwin's. I changed what I found to more accurately reflect what was known, to show in an internet forum. This was in resonse to debate at ARN Intelligent Design forum where the "Theory Of Intelligent Design" was to have been written but went to the KCFS forum instead due to scientist level challenge. I thought that at this time the old graphics would be worth uploading to this blog.<br /><br />The Creation Science perspective was that there was not one tree but a number of "kinds" like this:<br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivxBjPDuQ5TrlUOKND75HIEXtr_Nj2oPo1IZhd_PSGmm33eCcHtqEtbbc9QXJa5djrjaTXZiSH6Vzs-c89ijX_NqL-fhW3a3i-ApXK7MmRXHfentWEboZZLA_sCeXhEJvQrmRRn85hiYo/s1600-h/CreationPhyla.gif"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5313592939913765554" style="WIDTH: 360px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 270px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivxBjPDuQ5TrlUOKND75HIEXtr_Nj2oPo1IZhd_PSGmm33eCcHtqEtbbc9QXJa5djrjaTXZiSH6Vzs-c89ijX_NqL-fhW3a3i-ApXK7MmRXHfentWEboZZLA_sCeXhEJvQrmRRn85hiYo/s400/CreationPhyla.gif" border="0" /></a><br /><br />Science knew nothing about the very base, right away put a big question mark in the Darwinian view. So I added one where it came to a single line to make a single tree.<br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhUK_hE8_EJSCZ4qDYWEhHYcnQPPOKwIGgDoFtU2LL5KWfzaV46bTfaTUDoPigmw6FmGcdYUbuFVGqvlLnFmPGDssxri3n1tJvofjXTvglpRig-ZBnt20pSZzbr8o5JzvtzQ2K2UuaZWM/s1600-h/QuestionPhyla.gif"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5313592942184518594" style="WIDTH: 359px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 268px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhUK_hE8_EJSCZ4qDYWEhHYcnQPPOKwIGgDoFtU2LL5KWfzaV46bTfaTUDoPigmw6FmGcdYUbuFVGqvlLnFmPGDssxri3n1tJvofjXTvglpRig-ZBnt20pSZzbr8o5JzvtzQ2K2UuaZWM/s400/QuestionPhyla.gif" border="0" /></a><br /><br />Or just remove it from the image to end up looking like this.<br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrlL1Pxe9HrpxlkzyqsI-0900NZzOYvd86liPjn212dgFq1DmVVTWMsRBM7LGYh9o25gYv7qjvcJNUZHNkIqupbtJlnLYubR-CzId2ZLGDAeT4YfFtI7ln8hkTSAphj7yudLligfufH1I/s1600-h/Both2.GIF"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5313592942151953762" style="WIDTH: 360px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 209px" alt="" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrlL1Pxe9HrpxlkzyqsI-0900NZzOYvd86liPjn212dgFq1DmVVTWMsRBM7LGYh9o25gYv7qjvcJNUZHNkIqupbtJlnLYubR-CzId2ZLGDAeT4YfFtI7ln8hkTSAphj7yudLligfufH1I/s400/Both2.GIF" border="0" /></a><br /><br />With science now going towards the Creation Science perspective, the old graphics are again useful. Helps us prepare for the strange ways of science that makes it full of surprises. There is even a "Theory Of Intelligent Design" now in origin of life science that scientists find interesting too. See it here.<br /><br /><a href="http://theoryofid.blogspot.com/">http://theoryofid.blogspot.com/</a><br /><br />Big changes are coming for science that will no doubt end up in all science classrooms. The ID controversy can here be put behind us, by teachers now being empowered to teach what many said was impossible. Within bounds of science, Creationists will get the science they were hoping for. I wish them well with it...<br /><br />Gary<br />-Gary Gaulinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10925297296758439900noreply@blogger.com0